Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 


 
 Table of Contents  
REVIEW ARTICLE
Year : 2020  |  Volume : 30  |  Issue : 6  |  Page : 18-24

Echocardiography and Multimodality Cardiac Imaging in COVID-19 Patients


1 Department of Cardioneurovascular Diseases, Misericordia Hospital, Italy
2 Sub Intensive Care Unit, San Antonio Hospital, Padova, Italy
3 Cardiology, AOU of Modena, Modena, Italy
4 Cardiology, AOU Policlinic, University of Catania, Italy
5 Cardiology, Hospital of Desio (MB), Desio, Italy
6 Cardiology, Fatebenefratelli Hospital, Benevento, Italy
7 Geriatrics, AOU Mater-Domini, Catanzaro, Italy
8 Cardiology, “Mazzini” Hospital, Teramo, Italy
9 Intensive Care Unit, Hospital of Padova, Padova, Italy
10 Cardiovascular Pathology Unit, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
11 Monzino Cardiology Center, IRCCS, Milano, Italy
12 Rehabilitative Cardiology, Ospedale Riabilitativo di Alta Specializzazione di Motta di Livenza (TV), Treviso, Veneto, Italy

Date of Submission27-May-2020
Date of Decision18-Sep-2020
Date of Acceptance31-Aug-2020
Date of Web Publication26-Oct-2020

Correspondence Address:
Alberto Cresti
Department of Cardioneurovascular, Azienda Sanitaria Toscana Sud Est, Ospedale Misericordia, Grosseto
Italy
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/jcecho.jcecho_58_20

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 


The pandemic caused by the new SARS-CoV-2, named coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) disease, has challenged the health-care systems and raised new diagnostic pathways and safety issues for cardiac imagers. Myocardial injury may complicate COVID-19 infection in more than a quarter of patients and due to the wide a range of possible insults, cardiac imaging plays a crucial diagnostic and prognostic role. There is still little evidence regarding the best-imaging pathway and the echocardiographic findings. Most of the data derive from the single centers experiences and case-reports; therefore, our review reflects the recommendations mainly based on expert opinion. Moreover, knowledge is constantly evolving. The health-care system and physicians are called to reorganize the diagnostic pathways to minimize the possibility of spreading the infection. Thus a rapid, bedside, ultrasound assessment of the heart, chest, and leg veins by point-of-care ultrasound seems to be the first-line tool of the fight against the SARS-CoV-2. A second Level of cardiac imaging is appropriate when the result may guide decision-making or may be life-saving. Dedicated scanners should be used and special pathways should be reserved for these patients. The current knowledge on cardiac imaging COVID-19 patients is reviewed.

Keywords: COVID-19, echocardiography, imaging, multimodality, pandemic, SARS-CoV-2


How to cite this article:
Cresti A, Barchitta A, Barbieri A, Monte IP, Trocino G, Ciampi Q, Miceli S, Petrella L, Jaric E, Solari M, Basso C, Pepi M, Antonini-Canterin F. Echocardiography and Multimodality Cardiac Imaging in COVID-19 Patients. J Cardiovasc Echography 2020;30, Suppl S2:18-24

How to cite this URL:
Cresti A, Barchitta A, Barbieri A, Monte IP, Trocino G, Ciampi Q, Miceli S, Petrella L, Jaric E, Solari M, Basso C, Pepi M, Antonini-Canterin F. Echocardiography and Multimodality Cardiac Imaging in COVID-19 Patients. J Cardiovasc Echography [serial online] 2020 [cited 2022 Aug 13];30, Suppl S2:18-24. Available from: https://www.jcecho.org/text.asp?2020/30/6/18/299223




  Introduction Top


The pandemic caused by the new SARS-CoV-2, named coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) disease, has challenged the health-care systems and raised new diagnostic pathways and safety issues for cardiac imagers.[1] After the first stage of viral replication, with flu-like symptoms, 20% of the patients present the second phase of the disease with an exaggerated immunological response, a cytokine storm, with severe lung inflammation, with frequent cardiovascular involvement, that may lead to multiorgan failure, shock, and death.[2] Patients affected by preexisting heart disease are at high risk of complications and mortality.[3] An echocardiographic examination is commonly required to rule out the presence of cardiac injury, mainly secondary to a “cytokine storm,” acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), pulmonary embolism (PE), or shock; myocardial infarction (MI) or myocarditis may be suspected in some cases. Consequently, echo imagers are frequently exposed to the risk of infection.

The Italian Society of Echocardiography and Cardiovascular Imaging was the first Scientific Society to publish, on March 15, a document underlying the importance to ensure practitioners safety, followed by other societies.[4],[5]

There are still very few data on the echocardiographic features of the acute myocardial injury secondary to the SARS-CoV-2 infection and data must be derived from the single-center experiences and case reports.

In such patients, echocardiography is an easier tool to identify acute myocardial injury, whereas logistic and sanitizing problems limit the use of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) and in some cases, of cardiac computed tomography (CCT).


  Cardiac Involvement in COVID-19 and Imaging Top


Increased levels of troponin

Myocardial damage is a common complication of COVID-19 infection that has been reported in 7%–28% of hospitalized patients. Studies reporting the prevalence of troponin increase are summarized in [Table 1].[6],[7],[8] Most of them lack a multivariate analysis, but a correlation between troponin increases, the respiratory insufficiency degree, and mortality is evident. Shi et al. performed a retrospective study on 416 COVID-19 patients from Wuhan with a multivariate analysis: Those with acute myocardial injury (defined as troponin I elevation level regardless to electrocardiogram and echocardiographic findings) had a higher need for noninvasive and invasive mechanical ventilation and other complications such as anemia, ARDS, acute kidney injury, hypoproteinemia, and coagulation disorders.[7] The variables independently correlated with mortality were the presence of ARDS and increased level of troponin. The mortality rate is correlated with the magnitude of the reference value of high-sensitivity troponin I levels.[7],[9] Mild troponin elevation, i.e., 2–4-fold the upper normal value, is common in Type 2 MI, in acute heart failure, arrhythmias or PE, whereas a higher increase of troponin level, i.e., more than five times above the upper normal limit, suggests the probability of Type 1 MI, shock, Takotsubo syndrome, or myocarditis.[7],[10],[11]
Table 1: Studies reporting an increased level of troponin in coronavirus disease 2019 patients

Click here to view


Elderly patients, and those affected by copathologies, such as arterial hypertension, diabetes, previous stroke, and coronary artery disease, are more likely to be infected by SARS-CoV-2 and manifest a more severe respiratory impairment. Patients with ischemic heart disease or heart failure are more susceptible to cardiac injury and correlated to pneumonia severity, to myocardial ischemia, ventricular dysfunction, and arrhythmias, and a fatal deterioration can suddenly occur.[3] Moreover, systemic inflammation may cause coronary vasculitis, facilitate atherosclerotic plaque rupture, and enhance platelet activation leading to a Type 1 MI.[7] In these cases, the echocardiographic findings are the typical regional contractility dysfunction in a coronary territory. The cardiac imager should possibly be aware of the previous echocardiographic characteristics of those patients with a history of cardiac heart disease to correctly evaluate the actual parameters and contractility comparing them with previously available data. It has been observed a substantial increase in case fatality and complication rates during the pandemic, and this was mainly related to late arrival and admission of patients with acute coronary syndromes.[12] Severe systolic dysfunction, aneurysms, mechanical complications, and left ventricular (LV) thrombi may be easily detected with point of care echo thus rapidly suggesting the ideal medical or surgical treatment.

A Type 2 MI, in advanced stages of the disease, is more common [6],[7],[8] and may be secondary to hypoxia, sepsis, cytokine storm, heart failure, severe hypotension or shock, PE, stress cardiomyopathy, anemia, acute kidney failure. Indeed, MI with Non-Obstructive Coronary Arteries (MINOCA) seems to be the most frequent cause of acute coronary syndrome in COVID-19 patients.[13] Interestingly, an increased prevalence of Kawasaki-like coronaritis has been reported as an emerging complication during the COVID-19 pandemic in children.[14] Kawasaki himself in 1967 suspected that a coronavirus could be the cause of the syndrome that took his name.[15] About 2% of cases occur in the pediatric population,[16] and therefore, the cardiac imager should explore the coronaries in children affected or suspected to have contracted the disease.


  Myocarditis Top


The presence of the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 receptor in the myocardial cells represent the potential door-of-entry of SARS-CoV-2 within cardiomyocytes with an internalization process similar to SARS-CoV-1.[17] Whether SARS-CoV-2 may cause acute direct myocarditis, however, is still a matter of debate. Single case reports have been published, but the presence of the viral genome inside the myocardial cells has not yet been demonstrated. Cases of “fulminant myocarditis” have been described.[18],[19] In an Italian case report of a 53-year-old woman without known cardiovascular disease and increased troponin levels, transthoracic echocardiography showed normal LV dimensions with thickened and echo-brightened walls, diffuse hypokinesia with severe systolic and diastolic dysfunction and a circumferential pericardial effusion.[20] These signs are commonly found in acute myopericarditis, and there is no reason to suppose that the typical echocardiographic findings should differ from any other viral myocarditis and/or pericarditis. However, an endomyocardial biopsy has been performed only in two case-reports:[21],[22] Sala et al. reported a diffuse T-lymphocytic inflammatory infiltrates and interstitial edema, but the absence of the SARS-CoV-2 genome within the myocardium, whereas Tavazzi et al. found the viral particles within the interstitial but not inside the myocardial cells.

[Table 2] summarizes the reported cases: In none of them, the viral RNA has been detected inside the myocardial cells, therefore a definite diagnosis, according to the current European Society of Cardiology guidelines,[23] cannot be made.[24] A clinical scenario of myocarditis, sometimes “fulminant,” may be present but the cytokine storm itself may cause a myocardial injury whose clinical signs are not distinguishable from other myocarditis etiologies [Figure 1].
Table 2: Studies reporting suspected myocarditis in coronavirus disease 2019 patients

Click here to view
Figure 1: Case of cardiogenic shock in a 45 yo COVID-19 man and high hs-troponin levels suggesting possible “fulminant myocarditis”. (a): Three-fascicular block in ECG. (b) hemodynamic parameters show low arterial pressure and cardiac index, high systemic vascular resistance index, low global end diastolic index and increased extravascular lung water index. (c and d) Echocardiographic five and three-chamber views showing concentric hypertrophy or “pseudo”-hypertrophy due to myocardial edema with reduced left ventricular volume and systolic function (frame from Video 3)

Click here to view


Similar to the previous 2003 SARS-CoV-1 epidemic, an impairment of LV systolic and/or diastolic function, often reversible, and sometimes subclinical, seems to be common, even among those patients without preexisting heart disease. A sepsis-induced-cardiomyopathy with severe diffuse contractility impairment may be present.[25]


  Echocardiography and Ards Top


In hospitalized patients, COVID-19 may be complicated by ARDS in 19.6%–41.8% of the cases.[3],[10] In these cases, a right ventricular dysfunction (RVD) is frequently present, and it has been demonstrated to predict the mortality.[26],[27] Echocardiography is the best diagnostic tool to evaluate the presence and degree of RVD. A multiparametric evaluation is mandatory and requires an advanced level of competence. Due to the imaging difficulties in ARDS-ventilated patients, with a frequent absence of transthoracic windows, a trans-esophageal echocardiography (TEE) would be the best-imaging modality. A TEE may be performed even in the prone position, and it adds information on the presence of a right-to-left shunt across a patent foramen ovale, a condition that imagers are frequently asked to rule-out in this setting.[28] The appropriateness of the TEE should be always discussed, and the TEE examination performed only when required for decision-making, such as in cases of mechanical ventilation weaning difficulties due to a suspected cardiac dysfunction.


  Pulmonary Embolism Top


There is evidence of a link between thrombotic events such as PE and COVID-19.[29],[30] The cytokine storm induces a defective procoagulant/anticoagulant balance thus predisposing to deep veins thrombosis, microthrombi, and disseminated intravascular coagulation in severe cases. The raised d-dimer concentrations is a poor prognostic feature and a mortality risk factor.[10] Passive inactivity contributes to the thrombo-embolic risk. The logistic difficulties to perform a CT scan to confirm the suspect of PE, with consequent need of sanitation, may increase the role of ultrasound diagnosis, especially in the emergency conditions. The echocardiographer should be aware of the low sensitivity of echocardiography alone in the diagnosis of PE, of the possibility of pre-existing heart and respiratory disease, and that RV dysfunction is frequently secondary to ARDS in ventilated COVID-19 patients, rather than to a PE. A sign that could be is useful is the preserved RV apex contractility in PE (McConnell sign),[31] whereas in acute cor pulmonare secondary to ARDS the hypokinesia is diffuse. This sign has a 77% sensitivity and a 94% specificity for the diagnosis of acute PE, with a negative predictive value of 96%.

Multiorgan ultrasonography, the concomitant use of heart, lung, and ultrasound increase, (named “Triple Pocus”), increases the ultrasound diagnostic sensitivity up to 90% and a specificity of 86.2%[32] and should always performed [Figure 2].
Figure 2: Ultrasound diagnosis of pulmonary embolism treated with thrombolysis in a COVID-19 patient who underwent a cardiac arrest due to pulseless electrical activity. (a) Venous Ultrasound showing a deep femoral vein thrombosis. (b) Echocardiographic long-axis view showing a right ventricle enlargement and dysfunction. (C) Echocardiographic sub-xifoideal view showing a right ventricle enlargement and dysfunction (frame of Video 2). (d) After thrombolysis the echocardiographic long-axis view shows a right ventricle enlargement and dysfunction recovery which is confirmed by the sub-xifoideal approach (e)

Click here to view


Pulmonary hypertension is another issue. Some patients, after the acute phase, may develop an interstitial fibrosis whose the long-term follow-up is still unknown. Signs of right RV dilatation, RV dysfunction, and an estimate of pulmonary hypertension are the fundamental parameters for cardiac imagers, and should be monitored in the follow-up.

An appropriate use of echocardiography in every setting should be advocated, from the emergency department to the intensive care unit (ICU) and after discharge from the hospital, in patients with persistent effort dyspnea to evaluate and monitor the follow-up. An early identification of pulmonary hypertension, or any other cardiac abnormalities, can improve the clinical course, and help the scientific community in better understanding the long-term outcomes of recovered patients.


  Appropriateness of Echocardiography in COVID-19 patients Top


The decision pathway for echocardiographic imaging has to be refocused according to the need of avoiding any risk of contamination. Both the European Association of Echocardiography and Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI)[5] and the American Society of Echocardiography (ASE)[4] produced recommendation documents.

A systematic use of echocardiography is inappropriate in the diagnostic phase, and the prognostic stratification. Asymptomatic patients, or with mild, influenza-like symptoms (i.e., not hospitalized,) do not need to undergone an echocardiographic examination. On the contrary, a transthoracic echo is important in the follow-up of hospitalized patients affected by the multiple area of pneumonitis consolidations, in ARDS and complicated patients. [Table 3] summarizes the main indications. Patients with a suspected myocardial damage, due to ischemic electrocardiographic changes, or increased troponin levels, arrhythmias, unexplained hypotension or shock, suspected PE, difficulties to ventilation weaning are common indication in ICUs. Suspected pericardial effusion or infective endocarditis, in case of superimposed bacterial infections, a not uncommon condition in prolonged mechanical ventilated patients, are other possible indications.
Table 3: Appropriateness of echocardiography in coronavirus disease-2019 patients

Click here to view



  Imaging Modality Top


A dedicated echocardiographic scanner should be present in COVID-19 settings, both medical and ICU, to avoid logistic and sanitizing problems.

A dedicated cardiac imager should be present day and night, with at least the expertise to perform a point of care ultrasound (POCUS) or focused examination, including transthoracic, echocardiography, and venous ultrasound.[33] Such a “multimodality echo one-step approach” is of crucial importance in COVID-19 patients to achieve in a single step all the diagnostic and prognostic information.

When a dedicated scanner and/or an imager cannot be present 24 h a day, and the imager has to get in the COVID-area to perform the echo, the appropriateness should be discussed, and the imager should suggest the best diagnostic pathway for the patient, according to clinical status, performing only the examinations which are regarded essential for decision-making. Experienced operators are advocated due to the complexity of the pathologies, and the technical difficulties in obtaining good quality images. A new organizational model of remote consulting could be implemented, allowing, beyond protection from the risk of infection, the opportunity to exchange skills and experiences with mutual cultural enrichment.

Personal protective equipment should be used according to the risk level according to Institutional and current recommendations. The exam should be as fast as possible, and focused on the clinical indication, performed at bedside; still images and videos should be achieved rapidly, then interpreted and measured offline in a noninfected area. Less experienced echocardiographers may send images or discuss them using appropriate video-consult equipment. Archiving images is essential to review and compare them with future examinations in the same patient.

In ventilated patients the quality of imaging is often sub-optimal for several reasons: They are dyspneic, in supine and sometimes prone position, high positive end expiratory pressures are often used; low-quality portable ultrasound systems are employed.

In COVID-19 patients with ARDS, prone ventilation is used for the recruitment of alveoli to improve oxygenation.[34] In such position, the posterior views may be used. In a normal condition, the aerated lung is a barrier to ultrasound and the heart is not visible, on the contrary, in the presence of a pleural effusion and/or of a lung consolidation, positioning the probe on the posterior left chest wall may allow to explore heart views;[35] moreover, from a right posterior view, the inferior vena cava diameter and collapsibility are easily explored,[36] [Figure 3].
Figure 3: Ecocardiographic posterior views in COVID-19 patient. (a) Chest X-ray with multiple, bilateral and diffuse peripheral opacities. (b) CT scan with bilateral, subpleural opacities, septal thickening, air space consolidations and pleural effusion. (c-e) Ecocardiographic left posterior views showing, through pleural and pericardial effusion and parenchimal consolidation, left ventricle in short axis (diastolic frame of Video 1). (e) Systolic frame of same video. (d) Left posterior view in another case of large pleural effusion. (f) Right posterior view showing inferior vena cava collapsibility

Click here to view


In such patients, TEE would undoubtedly allow higher sensitivity with the mandatory use of the appropriate PPE, and a dedicated ultrasound machine and probe.


  Multimodality Imaging Top


First of all, a multimodality echo approach is mandatory. Echocardiography, chest echography, and venous ultrasound (the triple POCUS Approach) should be performed.


  Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Top


A suspected myocarditis or myopericarditis, and a MINOCA, are common appropriate indications for CMR which add fundamental diagnostic and prognostic information. Unfortunately, the feasibility of a CMR in COVID-19 patients is low, unless there is a disposable dedicated scanner, which is uncommon at present time.

The EACVI [37] and the Society of CMR (https://scmr.org/page/COVID19) developed recommendations which can be summarized as follows:

The exam should be performed only if absolutely clinically necessary and the appropriateness must discussed with the ordering physician. If no other imaging modality is presumed to rule out the decision pathway, the exam should be targeted, using shortened protocols and focusing the clinical question. Studies can often be safely deferred after the healing, such in cases of a suspected myocardial injury to evaluate the presence, site and extension of fibrosis. A special care should be paid before administration of contrast agent as the renal function is often altered in COVID-19 patients and the contrast could be contraindicated.


  Cardiac-Computed Tomography Top


Similar rules should be applied for CCT. A dedicated scanner should be present and a dedicated pathway planned. In this section we will summarize some diagnostic issues that may be important in this setting. In patients with increased troponin levels, in whom an acute coronary syndrome is suspected, a coronary CCT scan may be preferred to an invasive strategy, as in most cases a Type 2 MI is present without significant coronary lesions and the negative predictive value of the exam is very high. A Takotsubo syndrome may be evaluated acquiring CCT cine imaging of the ventricle contractility.[22]

In myocarditis the presence and distribution of Late Contrast Enhancement can be detected, and have a similar clinical significance, as commonly detected by CMR.[37],[38]

In case of PE the hemodynamic information necessary for risk stratification and guiding therapy can be achieved measuring from the CT scan the RV degree of dilatation and the right to left ventricular ratio,[39] avoiding the need of ultrasound.

In patients affected by atrial fibrillation or flutter, not uncommon arrhythmias in these patients, when a TEE cannot be performed, the presence of an appendage thrombosis may be ruled out by CCT [Figure 4]. Finally, in COVID-19 patients suspected to have an infective endocarditis, a positron emission tomography-fluorodeoxyglucose or a CCT scan may be a valid diagnostic alternative to overcome the logistic feasibility of a TEE study.
Figure 4: Computed tomography scan showing a right (a) and Left (b) appendage thrombosis

Click here to view



  Conclusion Top


Myocardial injury may complicate COVID-19 infection in more than a quarter of patients and due to the wide a range of possible insults, cardiac imaging plays a crucial diagnostic and prognostic role. There is still little evidence regarding the best-imaging pathway and the echocardiographic findings. Most of the data derive from single centers experiences and case-reports; therefore, our review reflects the recommendations mainly based on the expert opinion. Moreover, knowledge is constantly evolving. The health-care system and physicians are called to reorganize the diagnostic pathways to minimize the possibility of spreading the infection. Thus, a rapid, bedside, ultrasound assessment of the heart, chest, and leg veins by point-of-care ultrasound seems to be the first-line tool of the fight. Large scale registries and studies are needed to understand the independent prognostic role of cardiac injury and of the echocardiographic quantitative parameters involving both the old and the new technologies.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Cheung JC, Ho LT, Cheng JV, Cham EYK, Lam KN. Staff safety during emergency airway management for COVID-19 in Hong Kong. Lancet Respir Med 2020;8:e19.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Siddiqi HK, Mehra MR. COVID-19 illness in native and immunosuppressed states: A clinical-therapeutic staging proposal. J Heart Lung Transplant 2020;39:405-7.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Wu Z, McGoogan JM, Cheung JC, Ho LT, Cheng JV, Cham EY, et al. Characteristics of and Important Lessons From the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) Outbreak in China: Summary of a Report of 72 314 Cases From the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. JAMA 2020;323:1239-1242. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.2648.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Kirkpatrick JN, Mitchell C, Taub C, Kort S, Hung J, Swaminathan M. ASE statement on protection of patients and echocardiography service providers during the 2019 novel coronavirus outbreak: Endorsed by the American College of Cardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol 2020;75:3078-84.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Skulstad H, Cosyns B, Popescu BA, Galderisi M, Salvo GD, Donal E, et al. COVID-19 pandemic and cardiac imaging: EACVI recommendations on precautions, indications, prioritization, and protection for patients and healthcare personnel. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2020;21:592-8.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, Ren L, Zhao J, Hu Y, et al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet 2020;395:497-506.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Shi S, Qin M, Shen B, Cai Y, Liu T, Yang F, et al. Association of cardiac injury with mortality in hospitalized patients With COVID-19 in Wuhan, China. JAMA Cardiol 2020;5:802-10. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.0950.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Wang D, Hu B, Hu C, Zhu F, Liu X, Zhang J, et al. Clinical characteristics of 138 hospitalized patients with 2019 novel coronavirus-infected pneumonia in Wuhan, China. JAMA 2020;323:1061-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.1585.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Guo T, Fan Y, Chen M, Wu X, Zhang L, He T, et al. Cardiovascular implications of fatal outcomes of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). JAMA Cardiol 2020;5:811-8. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.1017.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Zhou F, Fan G, Liu Z, Cao B. SARS-CoV-2 shedding and infectivity-Authors' reply. Lancet 2020;395:1340.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Arentz M, Yim E, Klaff L, Lokhandwala S, Riedo FX, Chong M, et al. Characteristics and outcomes of 21 critically Ill patients with COVID-19 in Washington State. JAMA 2020;323:1612-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.4326.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Trabattoni D, Montorsi P, Merlino L. Late STEMI and NSTEMI Patients' emergency calling in COVID-19 outbreak. Can J Cardiol 2020;36:1161.e7-0.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Stefanini GG, Montorfano M, Trabattoni D, Andreini D, Ferrante G, Ancona M, et al. ST-elevation myocardial infarction in patients with COVID-19: Clinical and angiographic outcomes. Circulation 2020;141:2113-6.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Verdoni L, Mazza A, Gervasoni A, Martelli L, Ruggeri M, Ciuffreda M, et al. An outbreak of severe Kawasaki-like disease at the Italian epicentre of the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic: An observational cohort study. Lancet 2020;395:1771-8.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Kawasaki T, Gattinoni L, Tognoni G, Pesenti A, Taccone P, Mascheroni D, et al. Acute febrile mucocutaneous syndrome with lymphoid involvement with specific desquamation of the fingers and toes in children. 1967;16:178-222.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Docherty AB, Harrison EM, Green CA, Hardwick HE, Pius R, Norman L, et al. Features of 16,749 hospitalised UK patients with COVID-19 using the ISARIC WHO clinical characterisation protocol. medRxiv 2020. DOI: 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.1096.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Kuba K, Imai Y, Ohto-Nakanishi T, Penninger JM. Trilogy of ACE2: A peptidase in the renin-angiotensin system, a SARS receptor, and a partner for amino acid transporters. Pharmacol Ther 2010;128:119-28.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Zeng JH, Liu YX, Yuan J, Wang FX, Wu WB, Li JX, et al. First case of COVID-19 complicated with fulminant myocarditis: A case report and insights. Infection 2020:1-5.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Hu H, Ma F, Wei X, Fang Y. Coronavirus fulminant myocarditis saved with glucocorticoid and human immunoglobulin. Eur Heart J 2020. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa190.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Inciardi RM, Lupi L, Zaccone G, Italia L, Raffo M, Tomasoni D, et al. Cardiac involvement in a patient with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). JAMA Cardiol 2020;5:819-24.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Tavazzi G, Pellegrini C, Maurelli M, Belliato M, Sciutti F, Bottazzi A, et al. Myocardial localization of coronavirus in COVID-19 cardiogenic shock. Eur J Heart Fail 2020;22:911-5.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Sala S, Peretto G, Gramegna M, Palmisano A, Villatore A, Vignale D, et al. Acute myocarditis presenting as a reverse Tako-Tsubo syndrome in a patient with SARS-CoV-2 respiratory infection. Eur Heart J 2020;41:1861-2.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Caforio AL, Pankuweit S, Arbustini E, Basso C, Gimeno-Blanes J, Felix SB, et al. Current state of knowledge on aetiology, diagnosis, management, and therapy of myocarditis: A position statement of the European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Myocardial and Pericardial Diseases. Eur Heart J 2013;34:2636-48, 2648a-2648d.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Hendren NS, Drazner MH, Bozkurt B, Cooper LT Jr., Caforio AL, Pankuweit S, et al. Description and proposed management of the acute COVID-19 cardiovascular syndrome. Circulation 2020;141:1903-14.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Li SS, Cheng CW, Fu CL, Chan YH, Lee MP, Chan JW, et al. Left ventricular performance in patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome: A 30-day echocardiographic follow-up study. Circulation 2003;108:1798-803.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Lhéritier G, Legras A, Caille A, Lherm T, Mathonnet A, Frat JP, et al. Prevalence and prognostic value of acute cor pulmonale and patent foramen ovale in ventilated patients with early acute respiratory distress syndrome: A multicenter study. Intensive Care Med 2013;39:1734-42.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Boissier F, Katsahian S, Razazi K, Thille AW, Roche-Campo F, Leon R, et al. Prevalence and prognosis of cor pulmonale during protective ventilation for acute respiratory distress syndrome. Intensive Care Med 2013;39:1725-33.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Lazzeri C, Cianchi G, Bonizzoli M, Batacchi S, Peris A, Gensini GF. The potential role and limitations of echocardiography in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Ther Adv Respir Dis 2016;10:136-48.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Danzi GB, Loffi M, Galeazzi G, Gherbesi E. Acute pulmonary embolism and COVID-19 pneumonia: A random association? Eur Heart J 2020;41:1858.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Xie Y, Wang X, Yang P, Zhang S. COVID-19 complicated by acute pulmonary embolism. Radiology 2020;2:e200067.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
McConnell MV, Solomon SD, Rayan ME, Come PC, Goldhaber SZ, Lee RT. Regional right ventricular dysfunction detected by echocardiography in acute pulmonary embolism. Am J Cardiol 1996;78:469-73.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
Nazerian P, Vanni S, Volpicelli G, Gigli C, Zanobetti M, Bartolucci M, et al. Accuracy of point-of-care multiorgan ultrasonography for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Chest 2014;145:950-7.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
Johri AM, Galen B, Kirkpatrick JN, Lanspa M, Mulvagh S, Thamman R. ASE statement on point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) during the 2019 novel coronavirus pandemic. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2020;33:670-3.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.
Gattinoni L, Tognoni G, Pesenti A, Taccone P, Mascheroni D, Labarta V, et al. Effect of prone positioning on the survival of patients with acute respiratory failure. N Engl J Med 2001;345:568-73.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.
Carbone A, D'Andrea A, Liccardo B, Caso P. Cardiac back view: An old forgotten echocardiographic window. J Cardiovasc Echogr 2018;28:150.  Back to cited text no. 35
    
36.
Hensley J, Wang H. Assessment of volume status during prone spine surgery via a novel point-of-care ultrasound technique. Cureus 2019;11:e4601.  Back to cited text no. 36
    
37.
Cosyns B, Lochy S, Luchian ML, Gimelli A, Pontone G, Allard SD, et al. The role of cardiovascular imaging for myocardial injury in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2020;21:709-14.  Back to cited text no. 37
    
38.
Axsom K, Lin F, Weinsaft JW, Min JK. Evaluation of myocarditis with delayed-enhancement computed tomography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2009;3:409-11.  Back to cited text no. 38
    
39.
George E, Kumamaru KK, Ghosh N, Gonzalez Quesada C, Wake N, Bedayat A, et al. Computed tomography and echocardiography in patients with acute pulmonary embolism: Part 2: Prognostic value. J Thorac Imaging 2014;29:W7-12.  Back to cited text no. 39
    
40.
Chen N, Zhou M, Dong X, Qu J, Gong F, Han Y, et al. Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of 99 cases of 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia in Wuhan, China: A descriptive study. Lancet 2020;395:507-13.  Back to cited text no. 40
    
41.
Guan WJ, Ni ZY, Hu Y, Liang WH, Ou CQ, He JX, et al. Clinical characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 in China. N Engl J Med 2020;382:1708-20.  Back to cited text no. 41
    
42.
Yang X, Yu Y, Xu J, Shu H, Xia J, Liu H, et al. Clinical course and outcomes of critically ill patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia in Wuhan, China: A single-centered, retrospective, observational study. Lancet Respir Med 2020;8:475-81.  Back to cited text no. 42
    
43.
Barton LM, Duval EJ, Stroberg E, Ghosh S, Mukhopadhyay S. COVID-19 autopsies, Oklahoma, USA. Am J Clin Pathol 2020;153:725-33.  Back to cited text no. 43
    
44.
Tian S, Xiong Y, Liu H, Niu L, Guo J, Liao M, et al. Pathological study of the 2019 novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) through postmortem core biopsies. Mod Pathol 2020;33:1007-14.  Back to cited text no. 44
    
45.
Varga Z, Flammer AJ, Steiger P, Haberecker M, Andermatt R, Zinkernagel AS, et al. Endothelial cell infection and endotheliitis in COVID-19. Lancet 2020;395:1417-8.  Back to cited text no. 45
    
46.
Xu Z, Shi L, Wang Y, Zhang J, Huang L, Zhang C, et al. Pathological findings of COVID-19 associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Lancet Respir Med 2020;8:420-2.  Back to cited text no. 46
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Cardiac Involvem...
Myocarditis
Echocardiography...
Pulmonary Embolism
Appropriateness ...
Imaging Modality
Multimodality Im...
Cardiac Magnetic...
Cardiac-Computed...
Conclusion
References
Article Figures
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed892    
    Printed26    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded82    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal


[TAG2]
[TAG3]
[TAG4]